Case Summary
The plaintiffs, represented by NJK Narayaneeyam Apartment Owners Association and other members, are involved in a suit against the defendants, including Emma Pulimoodu and Kudu Pulimoodu. The case addresses a compromise agreement related to the ownership and rights associated with the property in NJK Narayaneeyam.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application IA 6/25 and decreed the suit based on the compromise agreement. This compromise agreement will form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case was decreed as it was settled through a compromise agreement accepted by the court.
The case was decreed as it was settled through a compromise agreement accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case was decreed as it was settled through a compromise agreement accepted by the court.
The case was decreed as it was settled through a compromise agreement accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The court proceeded to decree the suit based on the compromise agreement which was presented during the hearing.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement forming part of IA 6/25.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- NJK Narayaneeyam Apartment Owners Association
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Xavier Shelly
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandrika Nair
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S.Bhaskaramurthi
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreejith G
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Emma Pulimoodu
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kudu Pulimoodu
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N.J.K Builders Pvt Ltd
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P.Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Uma R Kamath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.Rajagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.N.Manmadan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement forming part of IA 6/25.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise agreement
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.
Reference:
IA 6/25
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between NJK Narayaneeyam Apartment Owners Association et al vs Emma Pulimoodu et al regarding a compromise suit
Case Code Year
Case between NJK Narayaneeyam Apartment Owners Association et al vs Emma Pulimoodu et al regarding a compromise suit