Case Summary
Nizamudeen is the plaintiff and Rahma Beevi is the defendant in this case. The suit was heard but the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and no application was filed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee or file any application.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee or file any application.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee or file any application.
The plaintiff was absent and did not remit the balance court fee or file any application.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 Code of the Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nizamudeen
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahma Beevi
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R. Raj kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vijay Mohan. R.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Neeraj. C.B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected due to absence of the plaintiff and no court fee remitted.
Evidence:
Hence Plaint rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 Code of the Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nizamudeen vs Rahma Beevi regarding null
Case Code Year
Case between Nizamudeen vs Rahma Beevi regarding null