Case Summary
Nishad Mathew is the plaintiff who brought the suit against Mahindra & Mahindra, Financial Services Limited. The court dismissed the case due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff without representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absences.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent the case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
No representation for plaintiff. Posted with specific direction to appear.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nishad Mathew
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra, Financial Services Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Arbitration award regarding the subject matter.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N. K Mohanlal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vivek V Kannankeri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.V. M Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence without representation.
Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nishad Mathew vs Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra, Financial Services Limited regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Nishad Mathew vs Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra, Financial Services Limited regarding dismissal of suit