OS 460/2022

Case between Nisha K vs K Muthaiya regarding impleading minor children in the party array

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM

Judge

Smt. Jyothi Babu R.

Order Date

2025-06-21

Duration

Case Code No.

460

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

In this case, the defendant Nisha K is seeking to implead her minor children in a suit where the plaintiff, K Muthaiya, is the grandfather of the children. The court found that the children are not necessary parties for the proper adjudication of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition to implead the minor children as unnecessary parties in the ongoing suit.

Key Reasoning:
The court found the children are not necessary parties for the proper adjudication of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The court found the children are not necessary parties for the proper adjudication of the suit.

Supporting Evidence

However, the reason for impleading the minor children in the party array is not discernible from the petition. The children are not necessary parties for the proper adjudication of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, I.A.3/2024 is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K Muthaiya
Party Age: 72
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nisha K
Party Age: 37
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Alex thomas
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Anoop Varghese
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Jayakrishnan R
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The petition to implead the minor children in the party array was dismissed.

Evidence:

In the above circumstances, the petition cannot be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification