Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.384/2025

Case between Nisha Francis et al vs Nimmy Francis et al regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nisha Francis and Francis are plaintiffs against Nimmy Francis, John P.P., and Sarin Kumar regarding the partition of a property. The matter was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and passed a preliminary decree for partitioning the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partitioning the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report and passed a preliminary decree for partitioning the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties voluntarily entered into a compromise that was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties voluntarily entered into a compromise that was found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Mediation report received. Heard both sides in mediation report. Perused the terms and found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore a preliminary decree is passed as per terms of mediation report, partitioning the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nisha Francis
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Francis
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nimmy Francis
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
John P.P.
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarin Kumar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew J. Elenjickal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.T. Girijan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Raghunandanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adithya Narayanan K.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
preliminary decree is passed as per terms of mediation report, partitioning the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds.
Evidence:
Therefore a preliminary decree is passed as per terms of mediation report, partitioning the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nisha Francis et al vs Nimmy Francis et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Nisha Francis et al vs Nimmy Francis et al regarding partition of property

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won