Case Summary
This case involves the plaintiff Nisamudeen filing for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The plaintiff was absent during the latest hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, represented. Respondent absent, represented. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nisamudeen
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini Radhakrishnan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Indian Overseas Bank
- Relation
- represented by its Branch Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A. Jani
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sarath S.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kallada M. Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction u/s 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nisamudeen vs Mini Radhakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Nisamudeen vs Mini Radhakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.