Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 750 /2025

Case between Nirmala Kochaneth vs Manju Unnikrishnan regarding temporary mandatory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nirmala Kochaneth and Manju Unnikrishnan, siblings and legal heirs of their mother, are in dispute regarding access to a staircase and terrace of the family property after their father's death. The petitioner seeks a temporary mandatory injunction against the defendant for access.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioner's request for a temporary mandatory injunction, directing the respondent to hand over a set of keys for the staircase and terrace of the Kochaneth building.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary mandatory injunction to hand over a set of keys to the shutter of the staircase and the door to the terrace.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved a strong prima facie case in her favour for access to the shared property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed. Respondent is directed by a temporary mandatory injunction to hand over a set of keys to the shutter of the staircase (north-western corner in the Kochaneth Building) on the ground floor and to the door after the second floor leading to the roof/terrace above it all situated in the Kochaneth building described as plaint C schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Nirmala Kochaneth (56 years years) Sreevalsam, Palarivattom P O, Pin code- 682 025, Currently at The Gardens Building 123/S34, Jabel Ali, Dubai, UAE

Defendants

Manju Unnikrishnan (52 years years) Nandanam Kochaneth, Saint Martin’s Church Road, Palarivattom P O, Ernakulam, Pin code- 682 025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directed the respondent to hand over a set of keys to the shutter and the door leading to the terrace.
Evidence:
the court finds that the petitioner has proved a strong prima facie case in her favour to grant an interim injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the rights to the properties in question between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendant of the issues arising regarding access to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of communication regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The defendant's response to the lawyer's notice addressing the property access issue.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement related to the hoarding rental arrangements made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Email
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Termination notice from M/s Vantage Advertising regarding the hoarding contract.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual proof of the Kochaneth Building and its surroundings.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Building Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certifies municipal details related to the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes legal authority concerning the property management.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details observations made regarding the property for evidence in the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Additional visual evidence related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1 Series

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases