Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P 22/2024

Case between Niravath Jubily Chits India Pvt. Ltd vs Santhosh E M et al regarding Execution Petition

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt.Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
Case Code No.
22
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Niravath Jubily Chits India Pvt. Ltd is the decree holder represented by Mr. Antony P T. The judgment debtors include Santhosh E M, Subash E M, and Rahul K S, who are involved in an execution petition that was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was settled through mediation, and the court closed the case with liberty to the decree holder to revive it in case of default by the judgment debtors.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was settled through mediation, and the court closed the case with liberty to the decree holder to revive it in case of default by the judgment debtors.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Matter is settled at Mediation. Report received.

Judgment Evidence:

Execution Petition is closed as per the terms in the Memorandum of Agreement with liberty to Decree Holder to revive the same in case of default by the Judgment Debtor.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Niravath Jubily Chits India Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh E M
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subash E M
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rahul K S
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Jagadeesh T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Roja Kannambeth
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. V R Raveendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution Petition is closed as per the terms in the Memorandum of Agreement
Evidence:
Execution Petition is closed as per the terms in the Memorandum of Agreement with liberty to Decree Holder to revive the same in case of default by the Judgment Debtor.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P
Case Code Year
2024

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs S Somaraj et al regarding execution of decree
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society Reg. no. K 705/97 vs S Somaraj et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff's Court
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Listenup India Hearing Solutions Pvt.Ltd. vs Rapha Speech and Hearing Centre regarding Execution Petition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Sree Gokulam Chits and Finance Co(p) Limited vs Nirmal Kumar regarding execution petition
Munsiff's Court
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sahadevan M M et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Execution Petition Defendant Won