RPIA/30/2024

Case between Nida Fathima vs Sulaika et al regarding allowance of RPIA

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM

Judge

Sri. Yadukrishnan. B

Order Date

2025-07-18

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nida Fathima filed an application which was opposed by Sulaika and others. The court decided to allow the petitioner a chance to contest the case on merits upon payment of costs.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

The application is allowed on payment of costs of Rs.1000/- to the respondent.

Case Type

Civil Case

Final Judgment

The court allowed the petitioner's application contingent upon a payment to the respondent.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was given a chance to contest the case based on the merits despite objections.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner was given a chance to contest the case based on the merits despite objections.

Supporting Evidence

Considering the averments in the petition the petitioner can be given a chance to contest the case on merits.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, RPIA is allowed on payment of cost of RS.1000/- to the respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Nida Fathima

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sulaika

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Talhath

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hafsath

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nusrath

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammad Faisan

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Petitioner
Advocate Name: BALAGOPALAN P
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

RPIA is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.1000/- to the respondent.

Evidence:

Hence , RPIA is allowed on payment of cost of RS.1000/- to the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification