Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 509/2021

Case between N.Geetha vs Pradeep Kumar regarding partition

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-4 years 2 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a partition suit filed by the plaintiff N.Geetha against her brother Pradeep Kumar regarding the division of property inherited from their deceased parents. The plaintiff seeks to establish her rights over the family property and claims that the defendant has refused to partition the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to 6/7th share of the property, while the defendant holds 1/7th share. The counter claim by the defendant was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to 6/7th share of the property, while the defendant holds 1/7th share. The counter claim by the defendant was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had the majority share in the inherited property and that the request for partition was justified.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiff had the majority share in the inherited property and that the request for partition was justified.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff had the right over 6/7th share over the plaint schedule properties as per the legal documentation and testimonies presented.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit decreed as follows: (i) The plaintiff is entitled to get 6/7th share over the plaint A and B schedule property. (ii) Defendant is entitled to get 1/7th share each over plaint A and B schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.Geetha
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep Kumar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Will Deed No.2879/1116, Sale Deed No.610/15, Deed No.558/1/2021, Tax receipt, Building Tax receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kallada M. Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shenaji S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to a 6/7th share over the plaint A and B schedule property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get 6/7th share over the plaint A and B schedule property.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is entitled to a 1/7th share over the plaint A and B schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendant is entitled to get 1/7th share each over plaint A and B schedule property.
Relief Type: Court Fees
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant's share shall be allotted on payment of requisite Court fees.
Evidence:
The defendant’s share shall be allotted on payment of requisite Court fees.
Relief Type: Final decree
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Any of the parties may move the court to pass a final decree in these proceedings.
Evidence:
Any of the parties may move the court to pass a final decree in these proceedings.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the inheritance of property from the parents of the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of a sale of a 1/7th share in the property from a sibling of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the majority of the siblings have released their interests in favor of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies that the plaintiff is paying land tax for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies that the plaintiff is paying building tax for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between N.Geetha vs Pradeep Kumar regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between N.Geetha vs Pradeep Kumar regarding partition

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 08/30/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Anuja.S. @ Thanckhi vs Harilal et al regarding Partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dileep Kumar vs Pushpakumar regarding Partition and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayaprasad.V. vs Jaya Kumar.V et al regarding Partition and Recovery of rent
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asiya vs Abdul Nafi et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sharon.S.P et al vs Honey.S.P regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won