Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RC(OP).No. 35/2018

Case between Nazer vs Hafsath regarding delay in filing petition to set aside exparte order

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-17
Duration
approximately-7 years 18 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nazer, the petitioner, is seeking to set aside an exparte order against him in favor of Hafsath. The case revolves around procedural issues concerning the absence of representation and procedural delays in the original petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed both applications IA 01/25 and RP 65/2025, concluding that there was no sufficient ground to set aside the exparte order.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both applications IA 01/25 and RP 65/2025, concluding that there was no sufficient ground to set aside the exparte order.
Key Reasoning:
The delay in filing RP 65/2025 was not sufficiently explained as required under law.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
It is settled in law that the period who is sleeping over his rights is not entitled to get the remedies through the process of court and there is no reason stated or proved to condone the long delay of 55 days in filing RP 65/2025.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 01/25 and RP 65/2025 are dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nazer
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hafsath
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.I.Alexander Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.C.Ushadevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Application for condoning the delay of 55 days in filing RP 65/2025.
Evidence:
Therefore, the contention that it was not included in the list is incorrect.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
RP 65/2025 filed to set aside the exparte order dated 10/02/2025.
Evidence:
In view of my finding on point No.1, this point does not germane for consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nazer vs Hafsath regarding delay in filing petition to set aside exparte order
Case Code Year
Case between Nazer vs Hafsath regarding delay in filing petition to set aside exparte order

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 10/30/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Najumudheen vs Ruksana regarding setting aside an exparte order
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K.U Shiraz vs A. Abdul Rahim regarding eviction order.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Christopher vs K. Premalatha regarding review of prior rent order
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Raju @Raju Vaidyan vs Binu John regarding issuance of letter of request for production of license agreement
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Manoj Kumar.K vs Navas regarding petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won