Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P 244/2024

Case between Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank no. 3839 vs Sreekumar P S et al regarding Execution Petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt.Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-03
Duration
Case Code No.
244
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank is the decree holder represented by Secretary P Sheeba. Sreekumar P S and others are the judgment debtors involved in the execution petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the execution petition, requiring the judgment debtors to pay the decretal amount in 15 installments.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decretal amount to be paid in 15 installments
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the execution petition, requiring the judgment debtors to pay the decretal amount in 15 installments.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution petition was allowed based on the obligation of the judgment debtors to pay the decreed amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The execution petition was allowed based on the obligation of the judgment debtors to pay the decreed amount.
Supporting Evidence
The court allowed the execution petition based on the presented facts.

Judgment Evidence:

EA 1/2025 allowed. The judgment Debtor shall pay the decretal amount in 15 installments on the 5th of every month.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank no. 3839
Party Age
54
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekumar P S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chacko Zacharia
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girimon V V
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G Jayasankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rahul S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The judgment Debtor shall pay the decretal amount in 15 installments on the 5th of every month.
Evidence:
EA 1/2025 allowed. The judgment Debtor shall pay the decretal amount in 15 installments on the 5th of every month.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
In case of default the decree holder shall continue with the Execution Petition.
Evidence:
In case of default the decree holder shall continue with the Execution Petition.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Execution Petition is closed with liberty to revive the same in case of default by the judgment Debtor.
Evidence:
Execution Petition is closed with liberty to revive the same in case of default by the judgment Debtor.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank vs Rajesh R regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank no. 3839 vs Sheelamani Shaji et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Anickadu Regional Farmer’s Service Co operative Bank Limited vs Babu M T @ Jacob regarding execution of a decree.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nattakom Service Co-Operative Bank No.3839 et al vs Subash Raj R et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff's Court
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sahadevan M M et al regarding Execution Petition
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Execution Petition Defendant Won