Case Summary
The case involves Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank as the decree holder and Rahul, Marykutty K S, and Thankappan P K as the judgment debtors. The execution petition was closed due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was closed due to the absence of the decree holder.
Key Reasoning:
Decree Holder not represented and did not appear to give evidence.
Decree Holder not represented and did not appear to give evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder not represented. Judgment Debtor 1 and 2 represented. Decree Holder did not appear to give evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Execution Petition is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nattakom Service Co Operative Bank no. 3839
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahul
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Marykutty K S
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankappan P K
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G Jayasankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Athul John Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P
Case Code Year
2023