Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 281 OF 2016

Case between Naseema et al vs Illikkal Muhammadali et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2016-11-18
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Fri, 11/18/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs, including minors represented by guardian, filed a suit for partition seeking separate allotment of their shares in a co-owned property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition and passed a final decree allotting specific properties to the plaintiffs and defendants as per compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition and separate allotment of shares
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit for partition and passed a final decree allotting specific properties to the plaintiffs and defendants as per compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the compromise petition filed by the parties leading to the final decree for partition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court allowed the compromise petition filed by the parties leading to the final decree for partition.
Supporting Evidence
Since the compromise is lawful, the compromise petition is allowed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is decreed and a final decree for partition is passed as follows

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naseema
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o. Late Illikkal Siyamu
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Afsel
Party Age
17
Relation
Minor represented by guardian
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajmal
Party Age
15
Relation
Minor represented by guardian
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Illikkal Muhammadali
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o. Illikkal Saithalikkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muneera
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o. Illikkal Muhammadali
Plaintiffs Documents
Genealogical table, Document No. 2302/1999
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A.M. Rafeek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Fameesha. C.M.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Neethu.P.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition and separate allotment of shares
Evidence:
The suit is decreed and a final decree for partition is passed as follows

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Property partition dispute
Case Code
Case between Naseema et al vs Illikkal Muhammadali et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Naseema et al vs Illikkal Muhammadali et al regarding partition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 11/18/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 11/18/2016 - 12:00
From
Tue, 11/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Wed, 11/30/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Thottupurath Kormman's Son Chatha et al vs Koran et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won