Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 76/2022

Case between Nasar et al vs Grama Panchayat Secretary et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Nasar, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are officials and members of the Grama Panchayat. The case involves a dispute over a pathway that the plaintiffs claim ownership of, while the defendants allegedly attempted to encroach upon it.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from encroaching on the pathway and from renaming it. The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiffs compelling and unchallenged.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from encroaching on the plaint schedule pathway and renaming it.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from encroaching on the pathway and from renaming it. The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiffs compelling and unchallenged.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their ownership and rights over the pathway through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Through the unchallenged oral and documentary evidence, plaintiffs have established their case. So they are entitled to get a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. A permanent prohibitory injunction is granted in favour of the plaintiffs and the defendants 1 and 2 are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule pathway and incorporating the same into the assessment register of panchayath or any of the institution. 2. Defendants 1 and 2 are further restrained from renaming the plaint schedule pathway.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nasar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajoola
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nusaifa
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raheena
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nadirsha
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Grama Panchayat Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
LSGD Assistant Engineer, Public Works, Grama Panchayat
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noushad
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Property Tax Receipt dated 10.02.2022, Property Tax Receipt dated 10.06.2021, Property Tax Receipt dated 09.02.2022, Property Tax Receipt dated 05.04.2022, Office Copy of Advocate notice dated 28.01.2022, Postal Receipt dated 29.01.2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Shajilal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants 1 and 2 from encroaching the plaint schedule pathway and renaming it.
Evidence:
So they are entitled to get a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of ownership and rights over the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of ownership and rights over the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of ownership and rights over the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of ownership and rights over the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of Advocate notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence of prior communication regarding the defendants' encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence related to the notice sent to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nasar et al vs Grama Panchayat Secretary et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Nasar et al vs Grama Panchayat Secretary et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Mon, 01/31/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won