Original Suit No. 347/2013

Case between Narayanan et al vs Kari regarding property partition

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B.

Order Date

2016-11-30

Duration

3 years

Case Closed

Wed, 11/30/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners sought final decree for partition as per preliminary decree for dividing property among them.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Final decree for partition

Case Type

Civil Suit - Partition

Final Judgment

The court passed a final decree for partition as per the preliminary decree, allotting properties to respective parties.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The point is found in favor of the petitioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Narayanan
Relation: S/o. Nedungattu Kari

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Devayani

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Viswanathan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kamalam

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Santha

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sumathi

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Nalini

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Lalitha

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Prakasan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Pradeesh

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kari
Relation: S/o Thumbalangatt Kumaran

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Final decree for partition passed as per preliminary decree.

Evidence:

The point is found in favor of the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report

Submitted By: Court

Relevance:

Report submitted by Advocate Commissioner for property division.

Reference:

Document Type: Plan