Case Summary
Nandan.S is the plaintiff in this suit against Ajith kumar.N and Jyothilekshmi. The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent, and no representation or evidence was provided.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence led to dismissal.
Plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence led to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence led to dismissal.
Plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence led to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation for plaintiff. Case stands posted for balance court fee and exparte evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nandan.S
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ajith kumar.N
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jyothilekshmi
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Kulathoor S.V.Premakumaran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit stands dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021