Case Summary
Nandakumar Menon and Sreekumar Menon filed a rent control petition against Ganesh Kumar K.G. The case addresses the issue of non-compliance with rent payment orders.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petitioner to be put in vacant possession of the building
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the respondent failed to comply with the previous order regarding rent payment, leading to the petitioner being put in possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent did not comply with the court's order for rent payment.
The respondent did not comply with the court's order for rent payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent did not comply with the court's order for rent payment.
The respondent did not comply with the court's order for rent payment.
Supporting Evidence
The respondent having failed to comply with the order in R.C.A 2/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I am of the view that, the respondent having failed to comply with the order in R.C.A 2/2024 and having failed to show sufficient cause for not depositing rent arrears in liable to suffer consequence under section 12(3) of the Act. Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nandakumar Menon
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreekumar Menon
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ganesh Kumar K.G.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Documents supporting the rent control petition.
Defendants Documents
Documents opposing the rent control petition.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.N. Hari Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Preetha Hari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh Kumar T.K.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bindu T.N.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin K.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mathews Benny
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Keerthana V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anaswara Hari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Evidence:
Hence an order is passed under section 12(3) of the act stopping all the further proceedings in the rent control petition and directing the respondent to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the building forthwith.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Nandakumar Menon et al vs Ganesh Kumar K.G. regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Nandakumar Menon et al vs Ganesh Kumar K.G. regarding rent control petition