Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 163/2001

Case between Nandakumar Kartha vs Maniyan et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nandakumar Kartha filed a suit against Maniyan and others seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent them from forcefully entering and damaging his property. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and the rights to a way claimed by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court found that the commission report regarding property boundaries was not sufficient for adjudication and decided to remit the commission report back for further examination.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The commission report is not sufficient enough to adjudicate the matter in controversy. Therefore, it is necessary to remit back the commission report so as to ensure a fair adjudication of the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Nandakumar Kartha (69 years) Mummanottumadathil House, Kummanodu Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Maniyan (54 years) Mummanottumadathil House, Kummanodu Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Jayan (56 years) Mummanottumadathil House, Kummanodu Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Omanakunjumma (69 years) Mummanottumadathil House, Kummanodu Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs sought an injunction to prevent defendants from forcefully entering or damaging the property.
Evidence:
The suit is one filed for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from entering forcefully into the plaint schedule property or make destruction to the same.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the rights of the plaintiff over the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Referenced as the basis for the plaintiff's claim over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Document bearing No. 1195/2000
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the partition history relevant to the A schedule property.
Reference:
Document bearing No. 5830/95
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the previous ownership and stipulations related to the property.
Reference:
Document bearing No. 2113/1950
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The report's findings were discussed for the assessment of the property and were ruled not admissible in evidence.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases