Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.49/2020

Case between Nakulan vs M/s Indus Towers Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-28
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Code No.
49
Case Closed
Fri, 03/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Nakulan filed a suit against M/s Indus Towers Limited and another party regarding a legal matter. The court found that the plaintiff had repeatedly failed to file necessary petitions, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to file necessary petitions despite repeated requests.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's failure to file necessary petitions despite repeated requests.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff did not file the required petitions.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff did not file the required petitions.
Supporting Evidence
the plaintiff had made same submissions. But no petition to remove the case from the list seen filed or chief affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nakulan
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Indus Towers Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indus towers Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.P. Jayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Aswathy. M.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Issac Samuel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was dismissed as no petition to remove the case from the list was filed.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 03/28/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won