Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 50/2023

Case between Najuma palatta vs Kattayatt Parambil Sakeer regarding eviction of petition schedule property.

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-11-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Najuma palatta filed a petition seeking eviction of Kattayatt Parambil Sakeer from the petition schedule property. The petitioner requires the property for her husband's stationary business after the previous lease expired.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to surrender possession of the property within one month. The petitioner can claim costs from the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed, directing the respondent to surrender possession of the property within one month. The petitioner can claim costs from the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of PW1 and Exhibits A1 to A7 supported the petitioner's claim for eviction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of PW1 and Exhibits A1 to A7 supported the petitioner's claim for eviction.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A7 would show that the petitioner is entitled to an order of eviction as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is allowed under Section 11(3) of KBLRC Act as follows: The respondent is hereby directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room within one month from today...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Najuma palatta
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kattayatt Parambil Sakeer
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of the notice sent by Adv.Vishnu Yuvaraj, Reply notice sent by Adv.KP Gangadharan, Aadhar copies, Employment information of Petitioner's Husband, Documents obtained under Right to Information Act, Original passport of Petitioner's Husband.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M Raghu Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Danoj Kumar PK
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room.
Evidence:
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A7 would show that the petitioner is entitled to an order of eviction as prayed for.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner can realize the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioner can realize the costs of the petition from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of the notice sent by Advocate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the petitioner's claim for eviction by providing evidence of a notice served to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document contains the respondent's reply to the petitioner's notice, which is relevant to the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Aadhar Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the identity of the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Aadhar Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the identity of the petitioner's husband.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Employment information
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the petitioner's husband's employment history, supporting the claim for the necessity of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Documents obtained under RTI
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence regarding the shop room in the possession of the opposing party.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the identity and verification of the petitioner's husband.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Owner requires property for own use
Case Code
Case between Najuma palatta vs Kattayatt Parambil Sakeer regarding eviction of petition schedule property.
Case Code Year
Case between Najuma palatta vs Kattayatt Parambil Sakeer regarding eviction of petition schedule property.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Sasidharan regarding rent control eviction
Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won