Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 273/2021

Case between Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association vs Rajesh B regarding realization of transfer fee

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association, represented by its Secretary, Balagopal M, is suing Rajesh B for the recovery of outstanding transfer fees and interest. The defendant admits to purchasing an apartment but contests the legality of the transfer fee demanded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 37,400 along with interest. The defendant is also liable for the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs. 37,400 along with interest @6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 37,400 along with interest. The defendant is also liable for the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owes a transfer fee as per the association's bylaws.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owes a transfer fee as per the association's bylaws.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has proved his case prima facie. By virtue of clause 12 and the decision no 7 of AGM dated 30.09.2017, the defendant is liable to pay Rs. 50,000 as transfer fee.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs. 37,400 along with interest @6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Balagopal M
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh B
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
By laws of the plaintiff association, Relevant pages of minutes book of the plaintiff association for the period from 2023 onwards, Relevant pages of minutes book of the plaintiff association for the period from 2009 to 2019, AGM notice communicated through e-mail along with certification under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant, Reply to lawyer notice.
Defendants Documents
Printout of email sent to the defendant, Printout of email sent to the defendant along with AGM Minutes, Printout of reply email sent by the defendant.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abu Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aju Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Priya Elizabeth Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Kumar P V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover Rs. 37,400 along with interest at 6% per annum from the defendant.
Evidence:
The issue No.1 is found in favour of plaintiff. Thus the issue No.1 is found in favour of plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: By laws of the plaintiff association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced this document to establish the rules governing the plaintiff association, including transfer fees and interest on unpaid fees.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Relevant pages of minutes book of the plaintiff association for the period from 2023 onwards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to verify the appointment of the Secretary and their authority to represent the plaintiff association.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Relevant pages of minutes book of the plaintiff association for the period from 2009 to 2019
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used this document to assess the decision to increase the transfer fee from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 50,000.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: The AGM notice communicated through e-mail along with certification under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was introduced to demonstrate communication with members regarding annual general body meetings.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document served as evidence of the legal demands made on the defendant for the unpaid transfer fee.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply to lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was referenced to show the defendant's response to the plaintiff's legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Printout of email sent to the defendant
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This email was presented to indicate the correspondence regarding the transfer fee.
Reference:
Ext.B1(a)
Document Type: Printout of email sent to the defendant along with AGM Minutes
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was cited to show that the defendant received information about the AGM discussions.
Reference:
Ext.B1(b)
Document Type: Printout of reply email sent by the defendant
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This was used to show the defendant's stance regarding the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1(c)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court considered oral evidence from witnesses for both the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association vs Rajesh B regarding realization of transfer fee
Case Code Year
Case between Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association vs Rajesh B regarding realization of transfer fee

Quick Facts

Location
Kochi
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Maker Village vs M/s. V Robotics Innovations Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bajaj Electricals Limited vs Viswas Marketting Agencies regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won