Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 273/2021

Case between Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association vs Rajesh B regarding realization of transfer fee

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-12-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association, represented by its Secretary, Balagopal M, is suing Rajesh B for the recovery of outstanding transfer fees and interest. The defendant admits to purchasing an apartment but contests the legality of the transfer fee demanded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay an amount of Rs. 37,400 along with interest. The defendant is also liable for the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs. 37,400 along with interest @6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant owes a transfer fee as per the association's bylaws.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs. 37,400 along with interest @6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association (Age not specified years) Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Complex, Puthiya Road, Off K P Vallon Road, Kadavanthara, Kochi, Pin- 682020 Balagopal M (44 years)

Defendants

Rajesh B (54 years) Flat No. A-10C, Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment, Puthiya Road, Off K P Vallon Road, Kadavanthara, Kochi, Pin- 682020

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover Rs. 37,400 along with interest at 6% per annum from the defendant.
Evidence:
The issue No.1 is found in favour of plaintiff. Thus the issue No.1 is found in favour of plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: By laws of the plaintiff association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced this document to establish the rules governing the plaintiff association, including transfer fees and interest on unpaid fees.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Relevant pages of minutes book of the plaintiff association for the period from 2023 onwards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to verify the appointment of the Secretary and their authority to represent the plaintiff association.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Relevant pages of minutes book of the plaintiff association for the period from 2009 to 2019
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used this document to assess the decision to increase the transfer fee from Rs. 25,000 to Rs. 50,000.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: The AGM notice communicated through e-mail along with certification under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was introduced to demonstrate communication with members regarding annual general body meetings.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document served as evidence of the legal demands made on the defendant for the unpaid transfer fee.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply to lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was referenced to show the defendant's response to the plaintiff's legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Printout of email sent to the defendant
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This email was presented to indicate the correspondence regarding the transfer fee.
Reference:
Ext.B1(a)
Document Type: Printout of email sent to the defendant along with AGM Minutes
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was cited to show that the defendant received information about the AGM discussions.
Reference:
Ext.B1(b)
Document Type: Printout of reply email sent by the defendant
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This was used to show the defendant's stance regarding the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1(c)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court considered oral evidence from witnesses for both the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Kochi
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases