Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 272/2021

Case between Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association vs Pradeep R regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-21
Duration
approximately-4 years 7 months 21 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association sued Pradeep R for defaulting on lift repair fund payments. The association claimed Rs.28,950/- was due, including interest.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit on the grounds that it was barred by limitation. The plaintiff was unable to establish that the suit was filed within the lawful time frame.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit on the grounds that it was barred by limitation. The plaintiff was unable to establish that the suit was filed within the lawful time frame.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was barred by limitation as the claim accrued in 2016 and was not initiated until 2021.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was barred by limitation as the claim accrued in 2016 and was not initiated until 2021.
Supporting Evidence
The suit is barred by limitation. The plaintiff is not entitled for realization of money as claimed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeep R
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o Raja Raja Varma
Plaintiffs Documents
Bylaws of the plaintiff association, Minutes of AGM held on 12.03.2016, Minutes of managing committee meetings.
Defendants Documents
Email communications, Notices issued to the defendant regarding lift repair fund payments.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abu Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aju Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Muhammed Musthafa A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought a decree directing the defendant to pay Rs.28,950/- with 15% interest.
Evidence:
Since the suit is barred by limitation the plaintiff is not entitled for realization of money as claimed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bylaws of the plaintiff association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the legal framework and authority of the plaintiff association.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Minutes of meeting of Annual General Body of the plaintiff
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the election of the Secretary of the plaintiff association.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Email communication containing minutes of meeting of the Annual General Body
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides certified evidence of the meeting minutes.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Minutes of meeting of the Extra Ordinary General Body of the plaintiff association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Records the decision to collect funds for lift repairs.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Minutes of meeting of the managing committee of the plaintiff
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the revised amount to be collected from members for lift repair.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendant about the dues and interest.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of the Judgment in OS 1567 of 2016
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant case judgment regarding the plaintiff's complaint.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of Judgment passed in AS 44 of 2020
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Appeal judgment confirming prior rulings.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related communication involving the association.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Email Communication issued by the Secretary of the plaintiff
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents communication regarding lift repair fund.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Minutes of AGM
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Records decisions relevant to the repair fund.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Minutes of MC
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents decisions about defaulters.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Minutes of EGM
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Records decisions on necessary legal actions.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Minutes of MC
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents discussions on defaulters.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Minutes of MC
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents decisions regarding services to be withheld.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Minutes of AGM
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Records decisions relevant to the repair fund.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Email Communication
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Communication regarding lift repair fund.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Email communication between the plaintiff and defendant with regard to the Lift repair issue
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Discussions regarding the repair fund and payments.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Communication issued by the plaintiff to the defendant
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice regarding penalties for non-payment.
Reference:
Ext.B12
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notifies about payment defaults and actions.
Reference:
Ext.B14
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further demand for payment of dues.
Reference:
Ext.B15

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of lift repair fund
Case Code
Case between Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association vs Pradeep R regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Nagarjuna Pearl Bay Apartment Owners Association vs Pradeep R regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 03/09/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Apartment Owners Association

Similar Cases

Case between Westfort Gardens Apartment Owners Association vs Anoop Rishin regarding arrears of monthly maintenance and contributions.
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between MH-10A- Mystic Heights 1 Apartment Owners Association vs Shwas Homes Private Limited et al regarding maintenance of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sarith. S. vs Yasoram Pancharatna Apartment Owners Association regarding declaration and Injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Blue Chip Apartment Owners Association vs Dr. Roshini Abraham regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between DD Golden Gate Apartment Owners Association vs Arun Kuriakose regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won