Case Summary
The N S S Karayogam No. 1639, along with its registrar and other members, filed a petition to stay the proceedings of Original Suit No. 1173 of 2024 until the disposal of an earlier suit. The defendants include various members of the Karayogam who are contesting the authority of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to stay the original suit was dismissed. The court found that the matters in issue in the two suits are not identical and going ahead with both would not lead to res judicata.
Key Reasoning:
The issues in the two suits are not identical and do not warrant a stay.
The issues in the two suits are not identical and do not warrant a stay.
Why Defendant Won:
The issues in the two suits are not identical and do not warrant a stay.
The issues in the two suits are not identical and do not warrant a stay.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the above petition is not having merits and no purpose will be served by stay of this suit U/s. 10 of CPC.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the above petition is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N S S Karayogam No. 1639
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The Registrar of Karayogams
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V Sasidharan Nair
- Party Age
- 72
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunil Kumar S N
- Party Age
- 59
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C Padiralrishna
- Party Age
- 70
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M N Aravindakshan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o Neelakandan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K B Krishnakumar
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o Bhaskaran Pillai
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P P Narayanan Kutty
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o Krishnan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V S Premalatha
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o Shekaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T R Madhusoodanan
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o Raman Pillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shaji Chirayath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Pradeesh Chacko
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jiji M Varkey
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M K Safeela Beevi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Savitha Ganpathiyatan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil D Kartha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smitha Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Prayer for stay of proceedings in OS 1173/2024 pending disposal of OS 877/2024.
Evidence:
Accordingly, I am satisfied that the above petition is not having merits and no purpose will be served by stay of this suit U/s. 10 of CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N S S Karayogam No. 1639 et al vs M N Aravindakshan et al regarding stay of proceedings
Case Code Year
Case between N S S Karayogam No. 1639 et al vs M N Aravindakshan et al regarding stay of proceedings