Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 80/2022

Case between N. Mayadevi vs Shiju @ Thampi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-05-31
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months 16 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N. Mayadevi, aged 78, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Shiju @ Thampi, Sini T.V, and Sheela regarding her properties. The defendants are allegedly encroaching on her land and obstructing her enjoyment of the same.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from trespassing on her properties and prohibiting them from causing any damage or waste.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and causing damage to the properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has established her ownership and possession of the properties without any contradictory evidence from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants and their men and agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties and causing damage to the coconut trees and banana trees situated therein.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

N. Mayadevi (78 years) Rajaresmi House, Palace Road, Aluva Kara, Aluva West Village, Aluva Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Shiju @ Thampi (43 years) Kdavilparambil House, Vallarpadom P.O, Panambukad, Mulavukad Village, Ernakulam-682 504 Sini T.V (40 years) Naikkara Veedu, Panambukad, Vallarpadam P.O, Mulavukad Village, Ernakulam – 682 504 Sheela (58 years) Kadavil Parambil, Vallarpadom P.O, Panambukad, Mulavukad Village, Ernakulam – 682 504

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties and causing damage to the coconut trees and banana trees situated therein.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men and agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint A and B schedule properties and causing damage to the coconut trees and banana trees situated therein and from committing any acts of waste and mischief thereon to the peaceful enjoyment of the plaint A property by the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendants from encroaching into the plaint A schedule property and committing any kind of waste therein.
Evidence:
The defendants are restrained by way of decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from encroaching into the plaint A schedule property and from committing any kind of waste thereon and from doing anything detrimental to the right, possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule properties by the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/15/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases