Case Summary
Complainant N. Balan filed a case against accused Hamza under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The accused was acquitted as the complainant failed to appear for multiple trial dates.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under Section 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Bounce
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted under Section 256(1) Cr.P.C. as the complainant failed to appear for multiple trial dates.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Since the complainant is absent, it is not possible to proceed with the trial of the case. Hence, the accused is acquitted u/s 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Judgment Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.256(1) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N. Balan
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o Chandu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o Moidu
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Acquittal of the accused under Section 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.256(1) Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Bounce
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between N. Balan vs Hamza regarding cheque bounce
Case Code Year
Case between N. Balan vs Hamza regarding cheque bounce
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case