Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.596/2021

Case between M.V. Micheal and Alice Micheal vs Antony Micheal et al regarding settlement of a civil suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-06-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M.V. Micheal and Alice Micheal, have filed a suit against the defendants, Antony Micheal and Princy Antony. The case is about a matter that has been settled between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court accepted a memo filed by the plaintiffs' counsel indicating that the suit is settled. Consequently, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted a memo filed by the plaintiffs' counsel indicating that the suit is settled. Consequently, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The matter is settled between the parties.
Why Defendant Won:
The matter is settled between the parties.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel for the plaintiff filed a not press memo stating that the matter is settled between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence accepted. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V. Micheal
Party Age
77
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Alice Micheal
Party Age
67
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Micheal
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Princy Antony
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.A. Hakkim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.P. Sidharth
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.R. Nandakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for the plaintiff filed a not press memo stating that the matter is settled between the parties and hence not proceeding further.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.V. Micheal and Alice Micheal vs Antony Micheal et al regarding settlement of a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between M.V. Micheal and Alice Micheal vs Antony Micheal et al regarding settlement of a civil suit.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won