Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1098/2019

Case between M.V. Gopi vs Smt. Vanaja Satheesan et al regarding compromise terms

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-09-13
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 09/13/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.V. Gopi filed a suit against Smt. Vanaja Satheesan and others. The court addressed a compromise petition presented by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed as per the terms of compromise agreed upon by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed as per the terms of compromise agreed upon by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Compromise terms were found lawful and voluntarily signed by the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Compromise terms were found lawful and voluntarily signed by the parties.
Supporting Evidence
Compromise terms were found lawful and voluntarily signed by the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 04/2024 is allowed, compromise terms are found lawful, and voluntarily signed by the parties, hence accepted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.V. Gopi
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Smt. Vanaja Satheesan
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jyothi A.S.
Party Age
22
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jithin A.S.
Party Age
19
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abraham P. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ratheesh M.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anas C.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johny Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Divakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishnendhu V.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
IA 04/2024 is allowed, compromise terms are found lawful, and voluntarily signed by the parties, hence accepted.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Refund of court fee paid.
Evidence:
Further the plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee paid.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M.V. Gopi vs Smt. Vanaja Satheesan et al regarding compromise terms
Case Code Year
Case between M.V. Gopi vs Smt. Vanaja Satheesan et al regarding compromise terms

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 03/13/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 09/13/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won