Case Summary
Musthafa and Sajna sought injunction against Abdurahiman, but the suit was ultimately dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Not available
Not available
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhikammu
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajna
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- W/o. Firdouse
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdurahiman
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o. Moidu
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Sree Hari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Shafeek
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Musthafa and Sajna vs Abdurahiman regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Musthafa and Sajna vs Abdurahiman regarding injunction