Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP.No. 30/2024

Case between Murunthal Service Cooperative Bank Ltd et al vs Gopakumar et al regarding dismissal of petition for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-08-19
Duration
Case Code No.
30
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The decree holder is the Murunthal Service Cooperative Bank Ltd represented by its secretary in charge, P.A. Sreejit. The judgment debtors are Gopakumar and Raja Lekshmi, and the petition filed by the decree holder was dismissed for default due to their absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by the decree holder due to their absence during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by the decree holder due to their absence during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was absent and provided no representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was absent and provided no representation.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Murunthal Service Cooperative Bank Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopakumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raja Lekshmi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidhu.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Seenath Unnisa regarding petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Case Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Usha regarding decree execution.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Case Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank, Branch at Kundara vs Rejimon.S. regarding decree execution
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between State Bank of India vs Shamla regarding petition for default dismissal.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Kishore Kumar regarding Petition filed by Decree Holder.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Case Defendant Won