Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1085/2018

Case between Murukesh Shenoy vs Hemalatha B et al regarding declaration of property ownership and injunction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Murukesh Shenoy is seeking a declaration that a property belongs to him as per a family arrangement and is contesting a sham transaction involving the property. Hemalatha B and Rema Shenoy are the defendants, disputing the claims of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the plaintiff's application for the respondents to admit or deny the existence of a key document related to the family arrangement. The respondents are directed to respond within 7 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The application is deemed necessary for a fair adjudication of the issues framed in the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the respondents are directed to respond to the notice for admission or denial of the document dated 13.03.2011 as prayed within 7 days.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Murukesh Shenoy (49 years years) C.C 67/3132-B, Elooparambil house, T.D.Road North Gate, Ernakulam-682035

Defendants

Hemalatha B (47 years years) Poonithura, Village, Thammanam Desam, Karanakodam, Ernakulam Rema Shenoy (65 years years) Eluparambil, Kovilvattam Desom, CC 40/3364, Ernakulam Village, T.D. North -682035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought for respondents to admit or deny the existence of the family arrangement document.
Evidence:
the respondents are directed to respond to the notice for admission or denial of the document dated 13.03.2011 as prayed within 7 days.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Family Arrangement Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is crucial for determining the plaintiff's claims regarding the property arrangement.
Reference:
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The deed is claimed by the defendants to be a valid transaction transferring property rights, which the plaintiff contests as a sham.
Reference:
No. 1685/2017

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases