Case Summary
Murali.V.B is the plaintiff represented by his counsel, while Binoji.P.R is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear in court.
Plaintiff failed to appear in court.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear in court.
Plaintiff failed to appear in court.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff name called absent.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Murali.V.B
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binoji.P.R
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.A.Martin Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bejla Mary Bejoy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ratheesh.M.B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abraham.P. George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jose. P. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for defalult.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Murali.V.B vs Binoji.P.R regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Murali.V.B vs Binoji.P.R regarding dismissal for default