Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1024/2014

Case between Muraleedharan vs Chithralekha regarding settlement of suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muraleedharan is the plaintiff and Chithralekha is the defendant. The case was about a civil suit which was settled out of court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the joint compromise filed by the parties. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the entire court fees paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of entire court fees paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the joint compromise filed by the parties. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the entire court fees paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise are lawful
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the compromise are lawful
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of joint compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muraleedharan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chithralekha
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Balagopalan.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadhan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.V. Sabu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joseph.T.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of joint compromise.
Evidence:
Satisfied that the terms of compromise are lawful. Suit decreed in terms of joint compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muraleedharan vs Chithralekha regarding settlement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Muraleedharan vs Chithralekha regarding settlement of suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won