Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 483/2024

Case between Munas T.A vs P.H.Muhammad Kunju and Brothers et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Munas T.A is the plaintiff against P.H.Muhammad Kunju and Brothers and others. The case is about a civil suit that was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was settled in mediation, and the terms were found to be lawful. The mediation agreement is part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fee paid shall be refunded
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was settled in mediation, and the terms were found to be lawful. The mediation agreement is part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of mediation were accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of mediation were accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
Terms found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Closed in terms of Mediation. Accepting terms of Mediation. Mediation Agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Munas T.A
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.H.Muhammad Kunju and Brothers
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anas Muhammad P.M
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.M. Anvar Muhammad
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned
Defendants Documents
None mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.T Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Benraj K.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Razak
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aiswarya Sajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jose Paul Thottam
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Asif K. Mohamed Ali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Keerthi C.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shetal John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mary Meettu M.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ruksana K. Zubain
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Munas T.A vs P.H.Muhammad Kunju and Brothers et al regarding mediation settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Munas T.A vs P.H.Muhammad Kunju and Brothers et al regarding mediation settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won