Case Summary
The case involves Mulloor Chitty Funds Kochi Private Limited as the plaintiff and T M Jamal and Hisham as the defendants. The petition for the execution of a decree was presented but was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
E.P.
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition as it was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Both represented. Not pressed. Endorsed in E.P. Dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mulloor Chitty Funds Kochi Private Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T M Jamal
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hisham
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Denny Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lijo Raju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Basil Simon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Both represented. Not pressed. Endorsed in E.P. Dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
E.P.
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mulloor Chitty Funds Kochi Private Limited vs T M Jamal et al regarding E.P.
Case Code Year
Case between Mulloor Chitty Funds Kochi Private Limited vs T M Jamal et al regarding E.P.