Case Summary
The case involves Mujeeb Rahiman Muhammed as the plaintiff against HDFC Bank Ltd. and Prasad as defendants concerning an injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default with costs as the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muijeb Rahiman Muhammed
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- HDFC Bank Ltd.
- Relation
- Rep. By Branch Manager
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prasad
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- Business Executive
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Majeed Kalappattil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.A.K.Shibu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mujeeb Rahiman Muhammed vs HDFC Bank Ltd. et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Mujeeb Rahiman Muhammed vs HDFC Bank Ltd. et al regarding injunction