Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
EP 320/2015

Case between Muhammed vs Moideenkutty et al regarding Default Dismissal

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-02-16
Duration
1 year, 4 months, 7 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed, the decree holder, filed the case against Moideenkutty and others for failure to deposit batta despite repeated opportunities. The Execution Petition was dismissed for default due to non-representation of the petitioner or counsel.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Execution Petition was dismissed for default due to non-deposit of batta and lack of representation by the petitioner or counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of Execution Petition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Dismissal
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

No batta seen deposited even after giving repeated opportunities. No representation for the petitioner or counsel.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed (57 years) Karinkurayil House, Karippol, Vettichira amsom, desom, and post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Moideenkutty (50 years) Karinkurayil House, Thozhuvanur amsom, desom and post, Tirur Taluk Musthafa (0 years) Karinkurayil House, Thozhuvanur amsom, desom and post, Tirur Taluk Saidalavi (0 years) Karinkurayil House, Thozhuvanur amsom, desom and post, Tirur Taluk Nabeesu (0 years) Peringodan Veedu, Vengadu amsom, desom and post, Perinthalmanna Talu

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissal of Execution Petition
Outcome:
Description:
Evidence:
No batta seen deposited even after giving repeated opportunities. No representation for the petitioner or counsel.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Sat, 10/17/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases