Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 335 OF 2018

Case between Muhammed vs Kaja Najumudheen regarding eviction and damages for unlawful use and occupation of the plaint schedule rooms.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed is the plaintiff who seeks eviction of Kaja Najumudheen for unlawful occupation of shop rooms after the termination of a license agreement. The defendant has not vacated the premises despite a notice issued by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the premises within 2 months and granting compensation for wrongful occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop rooms within 2 months.
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the premises within 2 months and granting compensation for wrongful occupation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his case by adduced cogent and reliable evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. I. The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction, to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop rooms bearing No. TP. 23/231 and TP. 23/232 to the plaintiff within 2 months from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kaja Najumudheen
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer Notice dated 22-09-2018, Undelivered Cover.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.Mujeeb Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.K.Vasudevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to give vacant possession of the shop rooms.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction, to give vacant possession of the plaint schedule shop rooms bearing No. TP. 23/231 and TP. 23/232 to the plaintiff within 2 months from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to evict the defendant if they fail to vacate.
Evidence:
If the defendant fails to vacate the rooms within 2 months, the plaintiff is entitled to evict the defendant from the said rooms through the process of the court.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover damages for wrongful use and occupation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover Rs. 4,400/- per month as compensation for wrongful use and occupation of the room, from the defendant from 22.09.2018 till the surrender of the scheduled rooms.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover rent in arrears.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the amount of Rs. 52,800/- being the rent in arrears, from the defendant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff to terminate the license.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Undelivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the plaintiff's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted as part of the court proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submitted as part of the court proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed vs Kaja Najumudheen regarding eviction and damages for unlawful use and occupation of the plaint schedule rooms.
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed vs Kaja Najumudheen regarding eviction and damages for unlawful use and occupation of the plaint schedule rooms.

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abdul Kalam Asad vs Sulaiman. C regarding eviction and realization of arrears of rent.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Hilar @ Bava et al vs Saleem Poolakkatt regarding eviction and compensation
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.P.Koyamutty @ Kunhapputty vs Rilsad regarding eviction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ittikaparambil Palakkal Muhammed Kutty's Son vs Mujeeb et al regarding eviction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abdulla vs Sainaba et al regarding undisclosed matter
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Original Suit Unknown