Case Summary
Complainant Muhammed accused Abdul of dishonouring a cheque under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal under section 256(1) Cr.P.C. and return of the cheque marked as Ext.P1
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused, Abdu, was acquitted under section 256(1) Cr.P.C. for the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
The accused is hereby acquitted u/s.257 (1)Cr.P.C. and return Ext.P1 cheque.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdu
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P Mohandas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Abdul Gafoor.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Acquittal under section 256(1) Cr.P.C. and return of the cheque marked as Ext.P1
Evidence:
The accused is hereby acquitted u/s.257 (1)Cr.P.C. and return Ext.P1 cheque.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Muhammed vs Abdu regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed vs Abdu regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour