Restoration Petition 17/2024 in O.S 73/2020

Case between Muhammed Shiyas vs Manjusha et al regarding restoration of the suit

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

Judge

Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew

Order Date

2025-08-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Muhammed Shiyas, seeks to restore his suit due to a delay caused by his counsel's inconvenience. The court has heard the petitioner and allowed the restoration request.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Restoration Petition

Final Judgment

The court has allowed the restoration petition and the application, thereby restoring the suit.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in filing was only one day and was condoned in the interest of justice.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The delay in filing was only one day and was condoned in the interest of justice.

Supporting Evidence

The delay is condoned.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RP 17/24 and I.A.1/24 are allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Shiyas
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Manjusha
Party Age: 39
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.M. Mohanan
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Joint R.T.O.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kerala Government
Relation: represented by

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Justin David
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Government Pleader
Appearance Type: Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Application for restoration of the suit.

Evidence:

The delay is condoned. RP 17/24 and I.A.1/24 are allowed in the interest of justice. Suit is restored.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification