Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.370/2022

Case between Muhammed Latheef M.M. vs Basheer P.M. regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Muhammed Latheef M.M., did not appear in court, nor did his counsel. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of representation from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court found no basis to proceed without the plaintiff being present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, there is no representation for plaintiff even after serving notice and based on the submission made on last posting date, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Latheef M.M. (50 years) Chithuparambu House, Edathala, Aluva, Ernakulam District, PIN - 683 561

Defendants

Basheer P.M. (65 years) Puzhakkarayil House, Kunneparambu, Vazhakkala, Thrikakkara P.O., Ernakulam District, PIN – 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and his counsel.
Evidence:
Since, there is no representation for plaintiff even after serving notice and based on the submission made on last posting date, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases