Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.370/2022

Case between Muhammed Latheef M.M. vs Basheer P.M. regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Muhammed Latheef M.M., did not appear in court, nor did his counsel. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of representation from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court found no basis to proceed without the plaintiff being present.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. The court found no basis to proceed without the plaintiff being present.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The absence of the plaintiff and his counsel compelled the court to dismiss the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, there is no representation for plaintiff even after serving notice and based on the submission made on last posting date, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Latheef M.M.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Basheer P.M.
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Surendran N.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.M. Saidu Muhammed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reena Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and his counsel.
Evidence:
Since, there is no representation for plaintiff even after serving notice and based on the submission made on last posting date, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Latheef M.M. vs Basheer P.M. regarding default dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Latheef M.M. vs Basheer P.M. regarding default dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won