Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 26 OF 2016

Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Komu regarding lease and rent control

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-11-15
Duration
1 year 11 months 15 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed Kutty, represented by his son Sahad, filed a Rent Control Petition against Komu under section 5(1) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Rent Controller dismissed the Rent Control Petition filed by Muhammed Kutty against Komu.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not clear
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Hence Rent Control Petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Kutty (56 years) Chelakkottil House, Edayoor amsom, Athipatta desom, Tirur Taluk. Edayoor Post, Pin: 676 552

Defendants

Komu (Age not specified years) Room No. K.P. 1/599E First Floor, Chelakkod Building, Railway station road, Kuttippuram, Kuttipuram amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Relief claimed under section 5(1) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act
Evidence:
Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Hence Rent Control Petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 11/15/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases