Case Summary
Muhammed Kutty, represented by his Power of Attorney Holder, filed a rent control petition against Kommu. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition with costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the petition with costs
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed with costs as the petitioner was absent during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner absent. The counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Respondent is present. Hence the petition is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Kutty
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o. Avulan Kutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kommu
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o. Ithutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Power of Attorney document
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the petition with costs
Evidence:
Petitioner absent. The counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Respondent is present. Hence the petition is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Kutty et al vs Kommu regarding lease and rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Kutty et al vs Kommu regarding lease and rent control petition