Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 27 OF 2016

Case between Muhammed Kutty et al vs Kommu regarding lease and rent control petition

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-03-09
Duration
Less than a year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Muhammed Kutty, represented by his Power of Attorney Holder, filed a rent control petition against Kommu. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition with costs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed with costs as the petitioner was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the petition with costs
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner absent. The counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Respondent is present. Hence the petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Kutty (56 years) Chelakkottil House, Edayur amsom, Athipatta desom, Tirur Taluk, Edayoor Post, Pin: 676 552

Defendants

Kommu (40 years) Room No. K.P 13/130, Chelakkod Building, Railway Station Road, Kuttippuram, Kuttippuram amsom, desom & Post, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Dismissal of the petition with costs
Evidence:
Petitioner absent. The counsel for the petitioner reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner called. Absent. Respondent is present. Hence the petition is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 03/09/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases