Case Summary
Muhammed Kunju filed a suit against Thrikkadavoor Kureepuzha Muslim Jama Ath and others. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Kunju
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thrikkadavoor Kureepuzha Muslim Jama Ath
- Relation
- represented by President
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Munjeeb. Y
- Relation
- President
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muneer Mahlari
- Relation
- Vice President
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hashim
- Relation
- Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazim
- Relation
- Joint Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Humayoon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. P Gopalakrishna Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M. Ziad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Kunju vs Thrikkadavoor Kureepuzha Muslim Jama Ath et al regarding dismissal for want of prosecution.
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Kunju vs Thrikkadavoor Kureepuzha Muslim Jama Ath et al regarding dismissal for want of prosecution.