Case Summary
The petitioners seek eviction of the respondent from shop rooms owned by the petitioners for non-payment of rent, with the intention of using the premises for their own business purposes. Respondent failed to appear for the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved their need for eviction with cogent and reliable evidence.
The petitioner proved their need for eviction with cogent and reliable evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Muhammed Haji (62 Years years)
Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103
Alavi Haji (59 Years years)
Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103
Moideen Haji (56 Years years)
Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103
Defendants
Alachampatt Abdul Kareem (59 Years years)
Tirur amsom, Pookkayil desom, PO. Pookkayil Bazar, Tirur Taluk, 676 107
Abdu Rahiman (53 Years years)
Iringavur amsom, Vaniyannur desom, PO. Inringavur, Tirur Taluk, 676 103
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner within three months from today.
Evidence:
The court order explicitly states the eviction relief granted.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The court order explicitly states the recovery relief granted.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered this report as evidence
Reference:
Exbt. C1
Document Type:
Sketch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered this sketch as evidence
Reference:
Exbt. C2