Case Summary
The petitioners seek eviction of the respondent from shop rooms owned by the petitioners for non-payment of rent, with the intention of using the premises for their own business purposes. Respondent failed to appear for the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the premises within three months and allowed the petitioner to recover costs from the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved their need for eviction with cogent and reliable evidence.
The petitioner proved their need for eviction with cogent and reliable evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved their need for eviction with cogent and reliable evidence.
The petitioner proved their need for eviction with cogent and reliable evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Haji
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o. Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Alavi Haji
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o. Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Moideen Haji
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o. Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Alachampatt Abdul Kareem
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o. Bava Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdu Rahiman
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o. Karimbanakkal Kunhimoideenkutty Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned
Defendants Documents
None mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to give vacant possession of the petition schedule building to the petitioner within three months from today.
Evidence:
The court order explicitly states the eviction relief granted.
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner is entitled to realise the costs of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
The court order explicitly states the recovery relief granted.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered this report as evidence
Reference:
Exbt. C1
Document Type:
Sketch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered this sketch as evidence
Reference:
Exbt. C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Haji et al vs Alachampatt Abdul Kareem et al regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Haji et al vs Alachampatt Abdul Kareem et al regarding Rent Control Petition