Case Summary
The suit for injunction between Muhammed and Sharafuddeen was dismissed as the matter was settled between the two parties through a lawful compromise.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as the matter between the parties was settled through a lawful compromise.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Matter is settled between two parties. IA.2446/2016 filed under Order 23 Rule 3.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o. Muideenkutty @ Bava Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sharafuddeen
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o. Muideenkutty @ Bava Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed et al vs Sharafuddeen et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed et al vs Sharafuddeen et al regarding injunction