ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 73 OF 2014

Case between Muhammed Ali Haji vs Navarathna Business Developers Private. Ltd. et al regarding money deposit dispute

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-03-07

Duration

2 years 3 months

Case Closed

Tue, 03/07/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff, Muhammed Ali Haji, filed a suit against Navarathna Business Developers Private. Ltd. and others to recover money deposited with promised interest, which defendants failed to repay despite multiple demands and legal notice.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the law of limitation as plaintiff was not entitled to realize the amount from the defendants.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Dismissal of the suit

Case Type

Civil Suit - Money Realization

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit, ruling it was barred by the law of limitation as plaintiff was not entitled to realize the amount from the defendants.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed as it is barred by the law of limitation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Muhammed Ali Haji
Party Age: 73
Relation: S/o Puthukknattil Kammukkutty Master

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Navarathna Business Developers Private. Ltd.
Relation: Represented by its Managing Director

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hamza
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o Muhammed Kunhi

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Abdul Gani
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o Muhammed Musthafa

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammed Kunhi
Party Age: 57
Relation: S/o Hameed

Plaintiffs Documents

Cash Deposit receipts, lawyer notices, postal receipts

Defendants Documents

Memorandum and Articles of Association of Navarathna Business Developers(P) LTD.

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Realization

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Realization of money deposited along with interest @ 9% per annum

Evidence:

The suit is dismissed as it is barred by the law of limitation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cash Deposit Receipt

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Evidencing money deposited with the defendants

Reference:

Ext.A1

Document Type: Memorandum and Articles of Association

Submitted By: Defendant