Case Summary
Four petitioners residing in Thalakkad amsom and desom filed a petition under section 11(3) of Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petition was dismissed as the petitioner was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the petition
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed with costs due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Provide reason for the lose
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner's counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner is called absent. Hence petition is dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammad Abbas
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o. Hamzakkutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nadirsha
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed Abbas
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Adilsha
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammad Abbas
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parween
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammad Abbas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Majeed
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o. Hamza
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Evidence:
Petitioner's counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the petitioner is called absent. Hence petition is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammad Abbas et al vs Abdul Majeed regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammad Abbas et al vs Abdul Majeed regarding rent control