Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 83/2025

Case between Mubineez Ali vs Aravind Shanker et al regarding suit dismissal.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Mubineez Ali, filed a suit against defendants Aravind Shanker and Pranav P. V. The court dismissed the suit against one defendant due to lack of action and stated that the defendant is a necessary party.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed against the first defendant due to no steps being taken despite multiple opportunities. The second defendant was acknowledged as necessary.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed. I.A 2/25 dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mubineez Ali (36 years years) K-12. DLF New Town Heights, Seaport Airport Road, Kakkanad, Ernakulam, Pin Code 682 037

Defendants

Aravind Shanker (35 years years) Gokulam House, Kolady Prambil, Vennala P.O., Ernakulam. Pin Code - 602 028 Pranav P. V (36 years years) Pranavam, P.O Cheleri, Kannadiparamba, Kannur, Pin Code – 670 604

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Set Aside
Description:
Ad interim injunction granted therefore vacated.
Evidence:
Ad interim injunction granted therefore vacated.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed as against D1.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as against D1.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases