Case Summary
Muahamed Shareef, the petitioner, filed a rent control petition against Chalakkapparambail Fasalu Rehman under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, which was subsequently dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed as not pressed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The Rent Controller dismissed the petition as it was not pressed by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition filed by the petitioners under section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The petition is not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence Rent Control Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muahamed Shareef
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o. Abdu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chalakkapparambail Fasalu Rehman
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Rent Control petition dismissal
Outcome:
Dismissed as not pressed
Description:
Rent Control Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 dismissed as it was not pressed by the petitioner.
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muahamed Shareef vs Chalakkapparambail Fasalu Rehman regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Muahamed Shareef vs Chalakkapparambail Fasalu Rehman regarding rent control petition